A BETTER WORLD FOR ALL

September 24, 2006

Frank Carpenter, D.Min.

St. John’s UU Church

Cincinnati, OH

 

FALL MEDIATION

 

Now is the time for turning.

 

The leaves begin turning from green to red and orange, and blow in the wind.

 

Birds are beginning to turn, heading south once more.

 

Squirrels are storing food for the winter

 

For leaves, birds and animals turning comes instinctively,

 

But for us turning does not come so easily. We humans need spirit and ritual to call us to turning.

 

Muslims begin Ramadan

 

Jews begin Rosh Hashanah.

 

It takes an act of will for us to turn, to break with old habits.

 

Today, let us turn; let us remind ourselves of the higher cause.

Let us turn from selfish concerns to the well being of all. 

Let us sacrifice our petty interests for a better world for all. 

Let us turn, let us turn again to hear the call of justice and peace in our lives.

 

In silence, let us listen to our conscience.

 

Peace be with you.

 

 

SERMON:

 

Sometimes our religion, Unitarian Universalism, is described as more of a generic religion than anything else.  As some wit commented, when Unitarian Universalists pray, we begin “To whom it may concern.”

 

The truth in that is we want to be inclusive.  We seek to honor all people’s spiritual journeys.  Part of our name is Universalism.  The operative word of Universalism is ‘all;’ “ALL!” The operative faith statement of Universalism is that all people will be saved.  All, everyone, not one is excluded from our hopes and dreams. In the words of the poet Tennyson, we trust

That nothing walks with aimless feet;
    That not one life shall be destroyed,
    Or cast as rubbish to the void,
When God hath made the pile complete;

There are no evildoers so rotten that they shall not be brought home; no sinners so corrupt they shall not be lifted up in love.  When I say all, I mean all.

But is this a religion?

A hundred years ago the Harvard philosopher George Santayana said, “another world to live in – whether we expect ever to pass wholly over into it or no – is what we mean by having a religion.” 

Another world to live in, a better world to live in, is what a religion is all about.  Is there a better picture of faith?  For us as liberals in religion, another world to live in, a better world to live in means another world to live in for all, a better world to live in for all.

But as the philosopher suggests, for another world to be possible, we need to be able to get there.  Can we get there from here?  It reminds me of the story of a traveling salesman, downeast Maine, circa 1937.

He was trying to find Uncle Jeremiah’s general store outside Calais, Maine.  After getting lost a couple of times, he drove up in front of an old timer rocking on his porch, smoking his pipe. 

‘How do I find my way to Uncle Jeremiah’s General Store,” asked the salesman.

“Weeeell” the old timer said, “Let me think.” After a few puffs of smoke he began, “go down here to the old red barn and take a left at the stump…” and he trailed off.  “No, go that way over there to the old oak tree, take your right to Aunt Sarah’s house and go a piece...” and he trailed off again..

He gazed at the salesman through his smoke for a few more puffs and then past judgment, “Come to think of it, you can’t get there from here.”

Can we get there from here?  Can we get everyone into our ark and float through the stormy perils ahead of us?  Near the end of her book BATTLE FOR GOD, Karen Armstrong says, “At the end of the twentieth century, the liberal myth that humanity is progressing to an ever more enlightened and tolerant state looks as fantastic as any of the other millennial myths we have considered in this book.” (page 367) 

Perhaps as the liberal myth of progress has come to seem more idealistic, others have grabbed for the steering wheel. 

Robert Jay Lifton has studied many of the fantasies that people have about bringing on another world, of ending this world in the name of a better world.  Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Federal Building in Okalahoma City in 1995.  McVeigh was never without a copy of William Pierce’s THE TURNER DIARIES.  Turner flies his plane, loaded with a nuclear bomb, into the Pentagon, initiating an attack on all people of color (31)

A Japanese group, Aum Shinrikyo, released sarin gas in the Tokyo subway, hoping to begin World War III, which its guru Asahara saw in biblical apocalyptic dimensions.

We should in keep in mind that Robert Jay Lifton does not compare bin Laden and al-Qaeda with any medieval, marginal Islamic cult, but with groups such as Aum Shinrikyo.  He describes them as apocalyptic groups, groups that are possessed by the nightmare of nuclear devastation.

Lifton remarks:

Apocalyptic violence becomes the ultimate form of collective regeneration.  We may say that death is totalized, is focused upon as the source of this regeneration and the decisive indicator of apocalyptic achievement.  Whether through killing or martyrdom, death becomes equated with immortality.  Any such killing or dying is understood as part of God’s control over history.  In deciding who lives and who dies, zealots are invoking what they claim to be God’s project.  The principle of death and rebirth becomes rebirth through killing and dying.”  (SUPERPOWER SYNDROME, Page 22)

For such groups, the path to “another world to live” in is simple.  In Lifton’s words, it is purification through violence.  Through the cleansing of traitors and other evildoers, we get to a better world. There are good guys, saints, and there are evil guys, sinners.

But clearly this is not a better world for all. It is not about equality but dominance. It is not about compassion but hatred.  It is not about justice but fear.

And it is not clear what makes this a better world to us, a world that can only be built on the deaths of so many. Our vision of a better world, a juster world, a more equal world, a more compassionate world, our vision of a better world may be as much a matter of faith as others. But we can see ourselves getting there, however great the toil. In His book Hegemony and Survival, Noam Chomsky points out  that third world advocates of civil society, the World Social Forum, is ‘dedicated to the belief that “another world is possible.”’ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/books/23chombox.html?_r=1&oref=slogin  We are not alone.

In our Responsive Reading this morning, we affirmed once again the covenant we make with other Unitarian Universalist congregations.  We promote the inherent worth of each human being.  We call for equality, justice and compassion in all human religions.  We seek acceptance and encouragement in our spiritual growth.  Not only is this the better world we seek, it is the path to our better world, another world to live in, a place we can truly call home. Love is not only the goal, it is also the way.  In the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., “We must pursue peaceful ends through peaceful means.”   The whole project of destroying all evil is itself the root of all evil.  An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth will only end up with blind people unable to eat what little food is left.  There are two kinds of people in this world: those who divide the world into two groups of people and those who don’t.  Holding to Universalism, that we are all in the same boat, we do not divide the world into two groups of people.

We have dedicated ourselves here at St. John’s to this high cause of a better world for all, for we say in our mission statement that we are committed to “working for social justice.”

The philosopher George Santayana said, “another world to live in – whether we expect ever to pass wholly over into it or no – is what we mean by having a religion.”  What do we say is this other world to live in, this better world?

It is a better world for all.

It is a peaceful world for all

This better world for all, this better world for the next generation and the next is the high cause we serve here at St. John’s; to this we dedicate our service.

It is a better world for all.  It is a peaceful world for all.  And most of all, it is a world were everyone is involved in making it a better world.  You, me, everyone will serve this high cause if it is to come true.

That is how we can get there from here.

And this work does not wait for us, but calls for us today.

This past week I attended the monthly delegates meeting of the Metropolitan Area Religious Coalition of Cincinnati. It meets regularly at St. Peter’s in Chains, downtown. It is at these meetings that I have learned the most about the Collaborative Agreement.  After the riots and death five years ago, The City, the FOP, the plaintiffs and the U S Depart of Justice worked together to come up with an agreement to address many of the racial problems perceived in Cincinnati. 

I have heard Wendell France of the Citizens’ Complaint Authority. I have heard Assistant Chief of Police Rick Jenke talk about the changes of the Neighborhood Police Program in the city.  I have seen Duane Holm’s charts diagramming the Collaborative Agreement.  I have listened to Attorney Al Gerhardstein talk about racial profiling in the city and praise Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk’s strong and clear support of the Collaborative Agreement.

This past Wednesday, the gathered delegates heard the court appointed monitor, Saul Green, talk about where he sees Cincinnati’s efforts to build a better city.   And while he had progress to report, yet he left me with a worrying note.

The main issue facing the city is whether the progress made under the Collaborative Agreement will last, or will end with the end of the Agreement next August.  And Saul Green said when he has met with the parties to the Agreement, the City, the Police, the Plaintiff, the FOP, he has felt a distinct lack of energy.  And what does he ascribe this lack of energy to?  There is a real question whether the community cares.  Does the city want just policing?  The time is short to tell the City Council. 

Do you want the Citizen’s Complaint Authority to continue?  Have your written a letter to the City Council members asking them to continue funding? 

There is a simple truth involved here.  As I said, our UU vision of a better world includes everyone.  It’s a better world for all.  Now, that’s true here in Cincinnati. A safer Cincinnati is everybody’s job.  Do you think that a safer city is the job of the police? The City Council’s?  No, it is your job. 

Let’s look at this from another perspective. In discussions about our national foreign policy, we are hearing more and more cries for diplomacy.  Military force alone will not win the war in Iraq.  It is a political struggle as well as military.  Some speak of hard power and soft power.  Military force, to my way of thinking, represents a failure.  Working things out amongst the parties is the better way and if people end up dead in the streets of Baghdad or the streets of Cincinnati, I call that a failure.  It is soft power we need.  It is negotiation we need.  And this is just as true here in Cincinnati as in Baghdad.

The police are the strong arm of the law, but they will fail if only the police are working for a safer Cincinnati.  We need the strong arm of the law, but it is insufficient.

The City Council may be thought of as the head, but alone without heart and strong arms, the City Council will not build a safer Cincinnati.

What is the heart of the City? What pumps the energy of our city? It is the people; it is the citizens; it is civil society.  Only the people, all the people of the city can make our city a safer city, a better city.

A SAFER CINCINNATI IS EVERYBODY’S JOB.

If you are waiting for the police to make Cincinnati safer, you are wasting your time.

If you are waiting for the City Council to make Cincinnati safer, you are wasting your time.

If you are waiting for the Community Police Partnering Center to make Cincinnati safer, you are wasting your time.

A safer Cincinnati is everybody’s job.

Stop waiting for someone else to do your job. Go out and make Cincinnati safer yourself!

A number of us are busy working with the Friends of the Collaborative.  Last January the congregation voted to become a Friend of the Collaborative.  Sylvia Mersfelder, Gina Marsh, Gail Boggs, Marty Harrington, Joan Robinson, Judy Cirilo are involved. There are committees on PR and Youth and violence.  If you don’t like committee meetings, there are CPOP teams, letter writing to the powers that be.

One of the people I have gotten to meet is Al DeJarrnet.  Al is VP of the NAACP and serves on the Board of the Partnering Center.  At a recent meeting Al said that his goal is to have the Collaborative Agreement be part of the talk at barbershops and beauty salons.

You can do that.  Tell people that a safer Cincinnati is everybody’s job. In your unisex salon, talk about making Cincinnati a safer city, a better city.  Keep in mind our UU vision of another world:  everybody makes it there, and we get there peacefully. Talk to your barber, your hair dresser, as you sit beneath the hair dryer, talk about creating a safer city.

 

We include everybody in our vision of another world, a better world.

Gays and straights; black, brown and white; rich and poor. Muslims, Jews, Catholics included.

Today Ramadan starts, a time of fasting and reflection on the message of social justice that Mohammed brought.

Rosh Hashanah starts, asking for inner, spiritual work, for personal transformation.

As the summer ends and leaves change color and blow in the wind, I ask that you once again consider what is your vision of a better world for all.  And what are you doing to get us all there?

The poet James Russell Lowell wrote;

New occasions teach new duties; time makes ancient good uncouth;
They must upward still and onward who would keep abreast of truth.

So it is we all need times of reflection:  time to catch up with ourselves and our times; time to re-vision a better world; time to rededicate ourselves to a better world for all.