October 9, 2005
Rev. Dr. Frank Carpenter,
D.Min.
St. John's Unitarian Universalist Church, Cincinnati, OH
My first
year as a full time minister was as an intern at the
Those
of you active in Unitarian Universalist churches that year remember it well.
It was the year of anti-war protest.
Peter, Paul and Mary came to the
Anyone
interested in the history of Unitarian Universalism in the second half of
the 20th century could well read Tom Wolfe’s ELECTRIC KOOL-AID
ACID TEST. An electric kool-aid
acid test was putting LSD into the kool-aid punch at a conference. The first electric kool aid acid test was held
at the Canoga Park, CA, Unitarian church.
During
what for many seemed to be those halcyon times, a miraculous year, that Anno
Mirabilis, the UUA, our denominational headquarters, received a call for help
from a mid-western UU congregation. It seemed that one of there members was regularly
spiking the children’s punch with LSD during coffee hour. Being in community is not easy; that transforming
power of love does work mysteriously!
Had the
church leaders spoken with the person? Yes, to no avail.
They had
stood guard at the punch bowel and that had not helped.
They had followed him around the church, and still the punch was spiked.
What could they do?
The UUA
wondered if they had asked the person to leave the church?
Unheard of! After all, the person’s motivation was to create
spiritual experience for
the children. We strive to be inclusive.
We have trouble not including everybody; we don’t like to talk about excluding
people. I have heard it asked, How can you prove that UU’s are too obsessed
with including everybody? And the response:
if they had to form a firing squad, they’d arrange themselves in a circle.
Our Unitarian
Universalist interest in spirituality is thought to begin in the late sixties.
Spirituality also began to capture the attention of our nation. One person told a sociologist, “One day I woke
up and wondered: maybe today I should be a Christian, or would I rather be
a Buddhist, or am I just a Star Trek
freak?” [RESTLESS SOULS, 1] Spirituality, it was said was different from religion.
Religion was for people afraid of going to hell; and spirituality for
those who had already been there. Spirituality was mysticism without particulars:
Christianity without the cross, Buddhism without the Bo Tree. No particulars, nothing concrete; only universal
abstractions. In the words of the poet
Conrad Aiken:
Mysticism,
but let us have no words,
Angels,
but let us have no fantasies,
Churches,
but let us have no creeds,
No
dead gods hung on crosses in a shop,
Nor
beads or prayers nor faith nor sin nor penance:
And
yet, let us believe, let us believe.
We as
liberals in religion have at least talked about opening our doors wide and
welcoming all. And many have come;
you have come, been welcomed at the door. Your various faith journeys have enriched the
community, for that is why we are here.
And if
truth were allowed out, inclusiveness, acceptance is probably the oldest religious
agenda: love one another, honoring the path we are each on, our struggles,
our hopes; our sorrows, our dreams; encouraging us through beauty, meditation
and community. Christianity began as
the spiritual alternative to the oppressive imperialism of the
Today
as our Jewish friends are preparing for Yom Kippur and our Muslim friends
are in the midst of the holy month of Ramadan, shall we not also assume that
Jews and Muslims, along with Buddhists, and Hindus have their mansions? Whether there is a UU mansion in this construction
of heaven I do not know, perhaps we get to go from palace to palace, continuing
our spiritual journeys. Being in community,
even in heaven, is not easy. The transformative steps of promising and forgiving
are challenging.
This openness
to all people was the early message of Christianity; even
Being
in an open, inclusive community isn’t easy. Just like being in a family, or
working in an office, it takes work, thought, reflection. Being an individual in a community, one that
considers itself liberal and inclusive can be challenging. Encountering that challenge you will be changed,
you will grow.
Consider
again the mid-western congregation which called the denomination asking what
to do about the person who was spiking the children’s punch with LSD. A person
in the church was placing the children of the church at risk; it was not a
safe and caring community for those we all want to protect. The final advice
of the UUA after going though a number of options was to say that they should
ask the person to leave and if he didn’t, contact the police. As a group they asked him, and he didn’t’ return.
The congregation made the decision and acted on it. Was it ever easy being in community?
Nobody
likes to deal with the hard questions about what is acceptable in a community.
Our faith in the worth of everybody and equity and compassion in all
relationships make it hard for us to deal with it.
The concept of ‘sinner’ or ‘evildoer’ doesn’t fit into our perspective.
We all too often look for easy comprise.
As has been said, Unitarian Universalists don’t have Ten Commandments,
they have Ten Suggestions.
I think
the difficulty for us as liberals, wanting to be inclusive, of being in community,
can be explored by thinking about the meaning of the word ‘accept.’
We want to be accepted, “Just as I am” as the old time hymn has it.
Just
as I am, though tossed about
With many a conflict, many a doubt,
Fightings and fears within, without,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
Just
as I am, poor, wretched, blind;
Sight, riches, healing of the mind,
Yea, all I need in Thee to find,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
We want
to be accepted as we say in our first principle, as having supreme worth and
dignity, just as I am, without having to prove myself to you or anybody else.
But what does acceptance mean?
Does acceptance
mean acceptable? Is it acceptable to spike children’s punch with
LSD? We can point out what was unacceptable
was not the person, but the behavior. If
the punch spiker had just wanted to talk about it, people might have wondered,
but it might not have warranted a request to depart.
The founder
of our liberal religion, William Ellery Channing, ran into this problem in
his debates about slavery. Being a
good liberal he believed that slave owners had inherent worth and dignity.
Owning
slaves, he was the first to say, was a sin. But the radical abolitionists,
such as William Lloyd Garrison, repeated, time after time, called on Channing
not to just condemn the sin of slavery, but also condemn the slave owners
as human beings. But being a liberal, believing in the inherent worth and
dignity of each human being, Channing refused. What is acceptable in our sight
are all people. But not all behavior.
Yet ideas
have consequences. What would Channing
do if someone came to his church and preached a sermon in favor of owning
slaves? Would we welcome someone advocating
racism, homophobia? How do we feel about Islam? I was at a ministers conference recently where
there was discussion about how welcome Muslims might be in UU congregations,
regardless of their views of the fringe Muslim right.
Ideas have consequences.
At the
level of our theological diversity we tend to let things slide.
That is why the report “engaging our theological diversity,” the title
of the Commission of Appraisal report, is a call to a new level of spirituality
in our congregations. Engaging our theological diversity has never really
been undertaken. What will happen? We fear, perhaps quite rightly, that if we engage
each other, at the spiritual level, not just the behavior level, we will be
changed!
One time
early on in my ministry, in a small church in a
Boy!
Did I get blasted. The parents
of one of the children got back to me real fast.
Who was I to ask their child to talk with them about God? Jesus? Sometime later I learned that the child’s’
mother had an inoperable brain aneurysm and might die at any time. After I left the congregation, I did hear that
the child got home from school one day to find her mother dead on the kitchen
floor. I have wondered if living which
such fear of death inhibited them from talking about God, and perhaps the
after-life. Living in community is not easy and if they
talked about such things, they might have been changed.
And it
happens. Recently I watched an interview
of James Yee. Yes was the Muslim chaplain
at
Yee responded
he had grown up Lutheran and attended
Being
in community, a liberal, inclusive community is not easy. We will be challenged. That challenge offers to us the promise of the
transforming power of love and hope.
Being
in a community, a liberal, inclusive community, challenges us.
The challenge is whether we will be transformed by the love that underlies
the community, transformed into more caring human beings.
In our
opening hymn, the fifth verse went
Young,
growing God, eager still to know,
Willing
to be changed by what you’ve started,
Quick
to be delighted, singing as you go:
Becoming
a Unitarian Universalist may be the end of a journey.
More than that, I believe it is the beginning of a journey, a journey
into transforming community with others. Are
we willing to be transformed by what we started by showing up here?
Our Affirmation,
which means so much to many of us, continues the promise of the transforming
power of love that is at the core of inclusive spiritual community:
Love
is the spirit of this church,
The
quest of truth is its sacrament,
Service
is its prayer.
And
this is our [great] covenant:
To
dwell together in peace,
To
seek knowledge in freedom
And
to help one another.
Being
in community is not easy. It is our hope. The transforming power of love
is the promise of our lives.