Home
Back to Lammas 2001

EarthSpirit Our Sacrifices
Homily given by EarthSpirit's Lucas Hergert Celebrating Lammas, 2001, at St. John's Unitarian Church


The Unitarian Universalist Reverend James Reeb once asked the question, "Is there nothing worth risking one's life for? Are there no dreams or goals so important that we risk our destruction to gain them?" As our last president John Buehrens put it, James Reeb answered these questions with his life.

James Reeb's ministry was strongly rooted in social action, and in the summer of 1965 he was compelled to join the march on Selma, Alabama. While leaving a restaurant in the company of two other UU ministers, he was confronted by four white men and was beaten to death. The other two ministers were also beaten but had survived.

In 1531 Michael Servetus wrote a treatise on Unitarian theology entitled On the Errors of the Trinity. In medieval Europe this cannot be expected to have gone over very well. While he had evaded his trial for over twenty years he was finally apprehended in 1553. He would not recant his beliefs, and was burned to death for professing the heresy of Unitarianism.

Katherine Vogel was another burned for the crime of Unitarianism. Her final words said that as long as she stood by the truth as she was given to know it, then nothing evil could befall her soul after her life was ended.

These are brave people, folks. They all knew that they were risking their lives when they stuck to their guns and did what they thought was right. It is sometimes difficult to come to grips with the fact that some people have actually died affirming the principles of our faith. But, in point of fact, there are a myriad of reasons people have died for our faith. Some, like Vogel and Servetus, were sacrificed for our early theology. Others, like Reeb, died affirming the inherit worth and dignity of every person.

The beginning of August has often marked the first harvest for many farmers, and today you saw baskets of fruit being paraded into the sanctuary. When a piece of fruit is picked from a tree, a piece of that tree is very literally being sacrificed. The organism of the tree has given up a part of itself for the betterment of the human who will eat it, and that is all. Nowadays, its seeds will probably not be planted, and nothing will be given back to the tree in return.

This sets the stage for the symbolism of the August first ritual. For many modern Pagans, August 1st ("Lammas"), is the day that we recognize all of the sacrifices people have offered for the benefit of our faith's principles. We also acknowledge the sacrifices that must later be given in order to maintain our faith community. Today, in the spirit of this holiday, I will discuss a different kind of sacrifice that we, the UU body, must make in order to not only maintain our integrity as a movement, but our Earth as well.

I want you to think back on the commercials for vacations you most recently have seen. What do you think these commercials consider the most popular idea of escape in our culture? When the camera angles are placed on this environment, what do the scenes look like?

With a group of Unitarians, and with anyone really, I would expect several different answers, but what probably came to mind for many of you is some type of beach- setting. Possibly the Caribbean, with vast beaches and blue oceans that stretch to the horizon?

What the commercials for these resorts do not tell us is how quickly these beaches are becoming dirty with litter and blue waters are turning brown from pollution. What these commercials do not tell us is how damaging oil spills have been to the sea-life here, how the plastic from old six packs of coke gets hooked on the helpless sea animal and eventually strangles it. What we don't learn is that the people on neighboring islands are so dirt poor and disease is so rampant that we wouldn't want to look at them in magazines much less set foot on their vast beaches.

Why are these things not shown to us on as frequent a basis as we see these commercials? It seems like an easy question with an easy answer: truth, and more critically, ethics, do not sell. But this is not an easy or acceptable answer in the least. This is the hallmark of a society that is not only undemocratic and sick, but it also signals a society that has chosen to sacrifice community values for personal betterment. For greed. For unfettered capitalism. So in order to make money, our ignorance is allowed to run free. We do not think about the Mexican family that is forced to ride the circuit in order to pick our strawberries, preventing their children from attending school and thus creating another generation of poverty. Or we do not think about throwing that aluminum can into the garbage. It doesn't matter, that doesn't make me richer, so why should I care, why should I think about it? Our pervasive ideology is that we don't want to think about it. That's serious; that's important.

And this is just mostly. Mostly we do not think about these things. The scariest part is that sometimes we do think about it. I once overheard a woman say that she was sure her beaded scarf had been made by some child in India, that it must have taken days for that child to make that single scarf. I stared at her in disbelief. She concluded by saying that she can't save the world, and that someone has to pay those children their three cents a day so they can eat.

At that point I remembered back to a workshop I took at the University of Cincinnati on child labor. I was not impressed by much of the information I saw at this workshop, but I remember very clearly a certain set of pictures. These were pictures of children who had, since about the age of six, made similar beaded draperies. Their hands were completely mangled; they were so tiny and yet looked more crippled and weathered than the hands of someone who had seen seventy years of life.

These are the small sacrifices we make in order to live comfortably. These are sacrifices that are adding up and slowly eroding all of our Unitarian Universalist principles. If I cannot buy something from the store without eroding my religious principles I think it is only natural that I would start to question. Why are these things we except or don't know about or don't want to know about? I know it's not our fault, it is the culture we were raised in. Ok, so what can we do about it?

John Buehrens, former president of the UUA, writes that the implications of our growing world community call on us to be more conscious of these decisions. We can be informed, responsible consumers, but it does take a lot of time and effort and work, and it is often very difficult. And I don't mean to undervalue that struggle because I know very intimately how difficult it really is. It is difficult to feel connected to those poverty-stricken workers thousands and thousands of miles away. It is difficult to see pictures and feel that those people are not from a different world, that they are not human at all.

When people were first exposed to the conditions of the holocaust many had the same reaction as we do to the poverty of our world-neighbors. People felt disconnected from it; they could not believe it had happened and could not believe the world allowed it to happen.

Aldous Huxley, in Brave New World, paints a realm in which people are programmed to not feel badly about anything, to just wash any unpleasantness away with a hallucinogenic drug. The children in this world are conditioned from the beginning of life to react to situations in this way, growing up in a boarding school and never really knowing their parents. While I have much more hope for our world than Huxley's abysmal future, the point of our beliefs and impressions being formed in childhood were not missed.

Thandeka, associate professor of theology and culture at Medville/Lombard Divinity School, noted that there is an essential, primal connection we forge with our caretakers from the very get-go of life. If one smiles at an infant, the infant will smile back, if one broadens their smile, the infant will broaden his/hers.

A recent study was done where a baby was filmed flailing his limbs as his mother laughed and played with him. When the video was slowed down, the baby was seen to be moving in sink with his mother's voice; his seemingly random movements were not random at all.

Vicki Noble, a noted author on feminist spirituality, noted how she would sit in her rocker for hours on end with her baby. She described the experience as euphoric, as not knowing where she began and Aaron, her son, left off.

Many parents are connected to their children, very intensely and spiritually, beyond any physical evidence you could find in science. I mentioned a case earlier, but that was really just the tip of the ice-burg, it goes much deeper than that. My father dreamt, before I was born, that I would somehow be contaminated by light. I was later diagnosed with a disease that does not allow me to be in the sun. And this is just one example. Speak to almost any parent, and ask if they had no inkling of what their child's gender may be, what they may look like, what the child would be like. Sometimes it is just fantasy, but sometimes we are connected to our children and parents beyond explanation.

This primal connection we have with our parents is fantastic and unlike any other relationship we could have later in life. We later must set up barriers, keep people out, but for just about a year we are completely connected to our parents.

Everyone has that first experience where this trust is broken. When I reached the first grade I was placed in a classroom with a teacher who was physically abusive. While she never touched me I can remember very clearly her hitting the other children, though it was usually one child in particular. I almost want to say that he had it coming. He was a bully, constantly picking on me and other kids. What I can say for certain, however, is that he didn't get better with each consecutive punishment. In fact he got much worse. By the end of that year his bullying became ever more frequent and he began to torture animals.

His primal connection had certainly been broken, if it had ever been there. I do not think that his parents really knew how to handle him besides buying him more things. I remember at one point he stole several $20s from his mother's purse and buried them in the schoolyard, which, looking back, was probably a very symbolic act indeed.

This is not a sermon about the evils of money. My point is that nothing can substitute that primal connection we somehow loose later in life. Intimacy. As Thandaka pointed out during this summer's GA, a lack of intimacy is where it all goes wrong, where people snap, where we loose our connection to our parents, friends, our society and the Earth.

If anyone has read up on psychoanalytic theory, this school of psychology claims that most of our adult difficulties come from unresolved childhood conflict. While I do not agree with most of the things psychoanalysts have to say, I would agree that damage in our most formative years can be detrimental.

On the other hand, noted psychologist Karen Horney claims that all previous conflicts can be resolved through healthy, loving adult relationships. This is a way to reconnect to that primal sense of security, to regain sacrificed intimacy.

The difficulty then comes when we strive attach that primal sense of being to a larger connection of existence, to the interconnected web of life. What I have found is that a spirituality of immanence can help with the process. Starhawk says this on immanence: "Immanence is so much more than only paganism. People of all religions have experienced divinity as immanent." It is very difficult to act selfishly or exploit the Earth when one sees god as an integral part that existence. We are not only harming the inherent divinity in our neighbor, we are harming a divinity that is a part of ourselves.

I would like to turn now to my experience as a young boy with my Roman Catholic grandmother. To my grandmother, Jesus was her concept of immanence. He was present in all people, and she felt that his love needed to reflect in the way she treated people. She disconnected herself largely from the dogma of Christianity and began to live the way she felt her god would have wanted her to. If I look back on my religious experiences with her, I could have seen this coming. Instead of frequently reading her Bible, she reads a book of prayers to the Virgin Mary on almost a daily basis. But this new theology is not easy for her. She was raised in an era and family that was racist, sexist, and over all bigoted. These were the sacrifices she made in order to more fully live her religion.

I admire my grandmother. I think in many ways she has achieved some type of spiritual understanding of her divinity that is reminiscent of the primal love we feel for our parents. As she grew older she did not, as most people do, become more set in her ways. If anything she became more open minded, saying that everyone needs to find the right religion for themselves, that people's personal lifestyles are their business and that over-all, no matter what transgressions take place, Jesus will still love that person. Almost sounds like Universalism.

But as much as I respect my grandmother's connection to her divinity, I cannot find god in the cathedral as she does. I feel that primal connection when I am in nature. Sometimes, in fact, I feel so overwhelmed with the feeling that I am a child of this diminishing wilderness that I am utterly overwhelmed by the sacrifices our race is making in the name of progress. These aren't the positive sacrifices that we name on the tide of August 1st, they are the shameful sacrifices tearing at the fabric of our co-existence with this earth.

When James Reeb opened his first sermon at All Souls in Washington D.C. with the question, "Is there nothing worth risking one's life for? Are there no dreams or goals so important that we would risk our destruction to gain them?", I am not sure what my answer would be. I can only hope that in the position of Reeb or Servetus I would have mustered enough courage to stick to my convictions, but I would have to be there before I knew for sure. And hopefully, for the cause of the Seventh Principle we will not have to be in that situation. If we all make our small sacrifices, then hopefully we won't need martyrs for our cause. I have spoken on a lot of negative sacrifices our society is making on our behalf, but sacrifice is not inherently bad. The word sacrifice comes from, and forgive my mispronunciation, the Greek "Sacre," which means sacred, and "Facer", which means to make. When we sacrifice a negative part of our existence in favor of a positive one, we are literally making that part of our lives sacred.

But how? How then can we work to live simply and in harmony with the earth? This fall, Earthspirit will be aiding in several projects to help educate the St. John's community on these issues. I have not found all the answers yet, and I can only hope that I find them in time, that we find them in time.

These sacrifices are not easy, they're not quick, but with support, I believe that they can be achieved. And by doing so, we can more fully live out our Seventh Principle:

Respect for the interdependent web of all life.

We have to start somewhere, maybe we can start here. Let the church say amen.

Lucas Hergert is President of EarthSpirit


Contact us with questions or comments.

Back to Lammas 2001
Home